I suppose in some sense I'm afraid of agreeing with this book. It leaves me with a similar
feeling as having read some Graeber during highschool, where I agree with most of the
observations but just don't really find the offered solutions, or the cause of the observations
to be particularly compelling. Fisher argues the typical point, that we cannot imagine a world
that is non capitalistic, that we are so stuck in the current system it is the only lens
through which we can view things. We are suspended in it, and thus cannot find a target to
strike at. I'd say that it has never been any different in advanced societies, while the
killing of Atahualpa was enough to end the Incas, even the restless guillotining in
revolutionary france didn't end absolutism for very long.
The only powerful agents influencing politicians and managers in education are business
interests. It's become far too easy to ignore workers and, partly because of this, workers
feel increasingly helpless and impotent. The concerted attack on unions by neoliberal
interest groups, together with the shift from a Fordist to a post-Fordist organisation of the
economy – the move towards casualisation, just-in-time production, globalization – has eroded
the power base of unions.
Similarly I'd disagree with this point. The merchant class is in essence
powerless. Think of the billionaries in silicon valley unable to even prevent taxation in their
district. He's right however that no one is going to help the workers, but I find it difficult
to compare a google engineer making 300k/y with a coal worker durig Marx' time.